After the earthquakes of 26 September 1997 in Central Italy, researchers
of GNDT (National Group for Protection against Earthquakes), SSN (National
Seismic Survey) and ING (National Institute of Geophysics) carried out
macroseismic surveys, mostly devoted to supply the Department of Emergency
Services with real time data on damage.
One of the big problems of this survey was the need of surveying the highest
number of localities in the shortest possible time; therefore, intensities
were assessed in terms of MCS intensity scales. Results can be found on this
web.
The management of the surveys was complicated by the high number of damaging
events which took place during about one month after September 26. Since
the high number of damaged localities made practically impossible to repeat
the intensity assessment after every strong earthquake, intensities are to
be considered in most cases as cumulative.
However, for about 80 localities it was possible to spend some more time
and answer questions related to the EM-92 intensity scale (Fig. 1). This
special survey was performed in two phases: October 4 to 8 and 16 to 17,
the second one after the 14 October, Sellano earthquake. Teams, based in
Macerata (Osservatorio Geofisico), were composed by two to three persons,
who filled in a very rough form designed on the spot. Data were later compiled
in a digital format.
These data were not fully processed, yet; they were also kept restricted
until recently in order to avoid conflicts related to the distribution of
emergency funding. They are now proposed to European investigators as a tool
for testing the EM-92 intensity scale and for discussing the practice of
macroseismic survey.
Investigators are invited to process data and submit results and comments.
A summary of the results will be presented at the XXIII EGS General Assembly,
Nice, NH3, 23 April 1998.
Massimiliano Stucchi (on behalf of the WG on EMS data of the 1997, Central Italy earthquakes) |
The survey was performed by:
R. Azzaro, M.S. Barbano, R. Camassi, C. Carocci, V. Castelli, I. Cecic, S.
Del Mese, P. Galli, I. Leschiutta, C. Meletti, D. Molin, G. Monachesi, G.
Morelli, M. Onida, M. Stucchi, A. Tertulliani
Data refer to 84 localities and 85 rows (the locality of Riofreddo was surveyed
twice).
They are proposed in 44 columns, divided into 3 sections:
Section 1 - official data | ||
N | locality number | |
loc | locality name | |
com | name of the community to which the locality belongs | |
prov | province code (MC = Macerata; PG = Perugia; AN = Ancona) | |
Lat, Lon | locality co-ordinates | |
h | locality altitude | |
in71 | number of inhabitants (1971 census) | |
in91 | number of inhabitants (1991 census) | |
date | date of survey | |
op | operator code (anonymous here) | |
Section 2 - data on damage (as reported by the operators) | ||
TNB | total number of buildings (according to the operator); ? points to figures which are in large contrast with in91 | |
AB | A-type buildings. | |
AT | total number of buildings Figures (S = single; F = few; M = many; Mo = most) are given for: | |
A0 | number of buildings with damage of grade 0 (no damage) | |
A1 | number of buildings with damage of grade 1 | |
A2 | number of buildings with damage of grade 2 | |
A3 | number of buildings with damage of grade 3 | |
A4 | number of buildings with damage of grade 4 | |
A5 | number of buildings with damage of grade 5 | |
BB | B-type buildings (same as A) | |
CB | C-type buildings (same as A) | |
DB | D-type buildings
(same as A) | |
Section 3 - data on objects and comments | ||
SO | reports on small objects | |
FU | reports on furniture | |
Note: no answers to questions concerning effects on people(felt indoor,
outdoor, frightened, awakened), on hanging objects, on china/glasses, on doors | ||
26.09/00.30 | comments on the effects of the first earthquake | |
26.09/09.40 | comments on the effects of the second earthquake | |
OTH | comments on the effects of other earthquakes. | |
A further list of general comments follows in Section 4 |